I suppose this means the NYT will not go under in 2012. So? It'll go under in 2013.
No one is doing anything for the economy. Either here (in Europe) or in the United States. Therefore, the economy will continue to stagnate. At the moment, folks are retreating, because of the poor outlook in Europe, to the dollar. This means the dollar is up, and makes Europe a bit more affordable so long as that lasts.
But the U.S. economy? An uptick? Because a bunch of people got hired for the Christmas season? What has Leonhardt been smoking?
尚大文 Consistently Progressive on Social, Economic, and Foreign Policy Issues • Professional, later 50s, a believer in the principles of representative government for and by the people that are the real living Constitution of our country, and in citizen involvement in government • Perennially novice Buddhist practitioner.
• Please visit my FDL diary here • Please bookmark home page if you find what you read here worthwhile • If you linked directly to a post here, click on the title "Gyromantic Informicon" above to go to home page • Click on post title or posting date for Permalink
I suppose this means the NYT will not go under in 2012. So? It'll go under in 2013.
ReplyDeleteNo one is doing anything for the economy. Either here (in Europe) or in the United States. Therefore, the economy will continue to stagnate. At the moment, folks are retreating, because of the poor outlook in Europe, to the dollar. This means the dollar is up, and makes Europe a bit more affordable so long as that lasts.
But the U.S. economy? An uptick? Because a bunch of people got hired for the Christmas season? What has Leonhardt been smoking?